Over the past 18 months, our analysts identified more than 40 transactions in Phuket and Koh Samui where an incorrectly established ownership structure led to financial losses ranging from 1.2 to 8.4 million THB per transaction. The pattern is consistent: buyers from Europe attempt to acquire a villa with land without fully understanding Thai restrictions on foreign land ownership.
Thai law (Land Code Act B.E. 2497, Section 86) prohibits foreigners from holding land title directly. A villa separated from its land loses 40 to 70% of market value. That single fact shapes every ownership structure in this market, yet we continued to monitor cases in 2025 where buyers had already transferred 30 to 50% of the purchase price before realising their chosen structure was defective or legally exposed.
Quick answer
- Foreigners cannot hold Thai land title directly; a villa requires an intermediate structure (leasehold, Thai company, or usufruct)
- The most common error is forming a Thai company with nominee shareholders solely to circumvent the land ownership ban; the Land Department treats this as illegal following regulatory amendments in 2023
- A 30-year leasehold with a renewal option is the most widely used legal structure, but its resale value runs 15 to 25% below comparable freehold
- Based on our estimates, correcting a defective ownership structure after closing costs 350,000 to 1,200,000 THB (legal fees, restructuring, transfer taxes)
- In Bophut and Maenam on Koh Samui, we record a higher incidence of defective structures than in Phuket - our estimate is 12 to 15% of foreign-buyer transactions
Options and scenarios
Case 1 - Thai company with nominee shareholders, Kamala
A buyer from Central Europe acquired a villa for 18.5 million THB in the Kamala area of Phuket in mid-2024. The developer offered a ready-made Thai limited company in which two Thai shareholders held a combined 51% stake as nominees. The buyer took 49% and the managing director role.
The structural flaw: nominee shareholding arrangements have been subject to intensified scrutiny by the Department of Business Development (DBD) since the 2023 regulatory changes. In December 2024, the DBD opened an investigation into the company.
Warning signals that were detectable in advance:
- The Thai shareholders contributed no capital proportionate to their stake
- The company conducted no operational activity beyond holding the property
- The shareholder agreement was not notarised
Financial cost: approximately 2.1 million THB for restructuring (conversion to leasehold, legal fees, transfer tax, company dissolution costs). Per our estimates, the buyer lost a further 1.5 million THB in market value on the shift from a freehold-equivalent structure to leasehold.
What we would recommend instead: a 30-year leasehold registered at the Land Office with a contractual option for two successive renewals, or a usufruct on the building combined with a registered leasehold on the land.
Case 2 - Unregistered leasehold, Bang Tao
A buyer acquired a villa valued at 12 million THB in Bang Tao. The developer presented a 30-year lease agreement, but the document remained a private civil contract only - it was never registered at the Land Office.
The structural flaw: an unregistered lease does not protect the buyer against third-party claims or against the land being sold to another party. Under Thai law (Civil and Commercial Code, Section 538), any lease exceeding three years must be registered to be enforceable against third parties.
Warning signals:
- The developer described the absence of registration as a 'process simplification'
- The registration fee (1.1% of assessed value) did not appear in the transaction cost schedule
- The Chanote (land title document) carried no annotation of a lease encumbrance
Financial cost: in 2025 the landowner sold the plot to a third party. The buyer lost access to the property and initiated litigation. Based on our estimates, total losses (lost asset value plus legal costs) exceeded 8 million THB.
What we would recommend instead: Land Office registration of the leasehold is an absolute prerequisite. Chanote verification at the relevant office must occur before any payment is made.
Case 3 - Usufruct with no succession provision, Layan
A buyer acquired a usufruct right over a villa valued at 22 million THB in the Layan area. The usufruct was correctly registered but established solely in favour of one individual, with no inheritance clause.
The structural flaw: under Thai law (Civil and Commercial Code, Section 1418), a usufruct terminates on the death of the beneficiary. Heirs do not inherit this right automatically.
Warning signals:
- No Thai-law will had been prepared
- The agreement included no mechanism for transferring the right to heirs
- The legal firm did not raise the succession question during the drafting process
Financial cost: following the beneficiary's death in 2025, the heirs lost all rights to the property. Both land and building reverted to the owner. Total loss: the full investment of 22 million THB.
What we would recommend instead: a usufruct should be paired with a registered 30-year leasehold on the land as a parallel security, together with a Thai-law will providing for transfer of the leasehold to named heirs.
Case 4 - Freehold in a Thai spouse's name, no prenuptial agreement, Rawai
A European buyer financed the purchase of a villa for 9.8 million THB in Rawai. Both land and building were registered solely in the name of the Thai spouse. No prenuptial agreement was executed.
The structural flaw: in divorce proceedings, Thai family courts divide marital property (sin somros), but land registered solely in one spouse's name may be treated as that spouse's personal property if they can demonstrate the funds predated the marriage.
Warning signals:
- No written agreement recorded the foreign buyer's financial contribution
- The Land Office required a declaration that purchase funds did not originate from a foreigner (standard form Tor Dor 21)
- The buyer had no independent legal counsel
Financial cost: following divorce proceedings in 2025, the investor recovered none of the invested capital. Loss: 9.8 million THB plus estimated litigation costs of 400,000 THB.
What we would recommend instead: a prenuptial agreement registered at the local Amphoe office before marriage, combined with a leasehold on the land in the foreign buyer's name and a superficies right on the building - or a genuine Thai business partnership structure rather than a nominee arrangement.
Case 5 - Sub-leasehold chain, Bophut, Koh Samui
A buyer from Europe acquired a villa for 14 million THB in Bophut, Koh Samui. The developer sold a lease, but held only a sub-lease itself, having leased the land from the Thai owner under a separate agreement.
The structural flaw: the buyer received a sublease that terminates no later than the developer's primary lease. The primary lease expired in 2036, leaving the buyer with an effective term of 11 years rather than the 30 years represented.
Warning signals:
- The developer did not produce a copy of its own lease with the landowner
- The Chanote identified a different owner from the developer
- The asking price was approximately 20% below the market rate for comparable villas in Bophut
Financial cost: based on our estimates, the market value of a villa with an 11-year leasehold is 5 to 6 million THB, against the 14 million THB paid. Net loss: 8 to 9 million THB.
What we would recommend instead: chain-of-title verification at the Land Office before any deposit is paid. The buyer should require a direct lease with the landowner, not with an intermediary.
Comparison table
| Parameter | 30-year leasehold | Thai company (compliant) | Usufruct | Freehold in spouse's name |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Legal for a foreigner | Yes, fully | Conditional - requires a genuine Thai co-investor | Yes, fully | Yes, but land is in the spouse's name |
| Land Office registration | Required | Company holds land title | Required | Registered to Thai spouse |
| Succession protection | Transferable by Thai-law will | Shares are inheritable | Extinguished on beneficiary's death | Subject to inheritance law |
| Regulatory risk (2026) | Low | High - active DBD reviews | Low | Medium |
| Resale value vs freehold | 75-85% | 85-95% (if fully compliant) | 70-80% | 95-100% |
| Setup cost (THB) | 150,000-300,000 | 250,000-500,000 | 100,000-200,000 | 50,000-150,000 |
| Common districts | Bang Tao, Kamala, Bophut | Layan, Surin | Rawai, Nai Harn | Rawai, Karon, Lamai |
Risks and mistakes
Based on the cases we have reviewed, our analysts identify five red flags that should halt a transaction:
- No Land Office registration - every property right (leasehold, usufruct, superficies) must be annotated on the Chanote. A document that exists only as a private contract offers no protection against third-party claims
- Nominee shareholders in a Thai company - if Thai shareholders cannot document the source of funds for their share subscription in proportion to their stake, the structure is illegal. DBD has been conducting active reviews since 2023
- Developer does not hold direct land title - a sub-lease shortens the effective tenure and sharply reduces market value. Chanote verification at the Land Office takes one working day
- No Thai-law will - even a correctly registered leasehold or usufruct can be lost by heirs without a will executed and filed in Thailand
- Tor Dor 21 declaration - when purchasing in a Thai spouse's name, the Land Office requires a signed declaration that funds did not originate from the foreign party. Signing that document severs the investor's formal claim to the land
A measurable benchmark we apply in our reviews: if the cost of correctly establishing an ownership structure exceeds 3% of the property value, the structure is likely over-engineered or unsuitable for the transaction. In our data sets, the typical cost range is 1.5 to 2.5% of villa value.
FAQ
Can a foreigner legally own a villa in Phuket in 2026?
A foreigner can own the building (structural ownership) but not the land beneath it. The most widely used legal arrangement is a 30-year leasehold on the land registered at the Land Office, combined with a superficies right covering the building. Direct land acquisition by a foreigner is prohibited under the Land Code Act.
How much does it cost to establish a correct villa ownership structure?
Based on our Q1 2026 estimates, the full cost covering legal counsel, Land Office registration, and title due diligence ranges from 150,000 to 500,000 THB depending on the structure chosen. That represents 1.5 to 2.5% of the value of a typical villa in the 10-20 million THB bracket.
Is a Thai company a legal way for a foreigner to hold land?
Conditionally yes, but only where Thai shareholders are genuine investors with documented capital contributions proportionate to their stake. Companies with nominee shareholders are subject to DBD review and may be compelled to divest the land. Regulatory risk for this structure has increased materially since 2023.
What happens to a leasehold when the leaseholder dies?
A leasehold is a transferable right and can be inherited under a Thai-law will. A usufruct, by contrast, extinguishes on the beneficiary's death and cannot be inherited. That distinction is frequently overlooked by buyers and represents a significant planning gap.
How do we verify a Chanote before buying a villa in Phuket?
Chanote verification (Nor Sor 4 Jor) is carried out at the local Land Office. Our analysts check: the identity of the registered owner, existing encumbrances (mortgages, leases, easements), boundary accuracy against the physical plot, and the land's legal status including any environmental restrictions. The process typically takes one to three working days.
Can a Phuket leasehold be extended after 30 years?
Thai law permits one renewal up to 30 years, but the extension requires the landowner's consent at the point of expiry. Contractual renewal options written into the original agreement are not automatically enforceable; they constitute a civil obligation only. We price this uncertainty at a 15 to 25% discount to freehold-equivalent value.
How much value does a villa lose from a defective ownership structure?
Across the cases in our data set, losses ranged from approximately 20% (missing registration, correctable) to 100% (full loss of property rights). The median in our sample sits at around 35 to 45% of the transaction value.
Is buying a villa in a Thai spouse's name a viable ownership structure?
It carries substantial personal risk. Without a prenuptial agreement registered before the marriage and without supplementary legal protections (a leasehold in the foreign buyer's name, a superficies right on the building), the investor has no formal legal claim to the land. We recommend this structure only when a full legal protection package is in place.
Researching property in Phuket or Koh Samui? Get in touch - our analysts will prepare a data brief for your shortlisted location.