Between August and September 2026, Thai authorities opened investigations into more than 11,000 nominee structures tied to land assets with an estimated combined value of 85 billion THB (approximately 2.4 billion USD at September 2026 exchange rates). According to Pattaya Mail reporting from 16 September 2026, around 2,200 of those entities simultaneously hold land titles and carry foreign capital participation above the statutory Thai ownership threshold. For any foreign buyer considering a freehold condominium purchase on Phuket or Koh Samui, this enforcement wave is not an abstract headline - it directly changes the document set that must be verified before signing.
The issue extends well beyond buyers who purchase villas through company structures. A developer building a condominium project may have acquired the underlying land through a nominee company, and several firms already under investigation have reportedly begun transferring assets to avoid seizure. If the developer's land-holding entity is classified as a foreign person under the Land Code, the provincial governor holds the authority to order a forced disposal of that land. The risk is cascading: it can affect an entire project, not just one unit within it.
Quick answer
- 11,000+ entities under active investigation by the Land Department and inter-agency committees as of September 2026
- 85 billion THB is the estimated value of land parcels linked to suspected nominee structures
- 2,200 companies have been positively identified as holding land with foreign capital participation above the legal threshold
- In August 2026, the Ministry of Interior expanded investigative powers: provincial committees can now access immigration, tax, and banking records for company shareholders (per Legal500, August 2026)
- Some companies under investigation are actively moving assets, meaning the land title beneath a condominium project can change hands during construction
- For a freehold condo buyer, the critical verification is the land ownership chain beneath the project, not only the individual unit title
Options and scenarios
Our analysts monitor three recurring situations in which a foreign buyer can encounter nominee-related exposure when purchasing a condominium on Phuket or Koh Samui in 2026.
Scenario 1: Developer acquired land through a nominee company
A developer building a condominium project in Bang Tao or Chaweng purchased the underlying land through a company with nominal Thai shareholders. That company appears on the Land Department investigation list. In the worst-case outcome, the provincial governor orders a land disposal, which blocks registration of individual unit title deeds (chanote) at the Land Office. A buyer who has already paid 30 to 50 percent of the purchase price in construction-stage instalments is left with a civil claim against the developer's entity rather than a property.
Scenario 2: Secondary market purchase from a seller with nominee exposure
A foreign buyer acquires a resale condominium unit in the Kamala area. The seller is a foreign national who also owns a villa through a company structure currently under investigation. The freehold condo unit itself may be legally clean, but the seller can have frozen assets or an active proceeding against them, which complicates the fund transfer and title registration at the Land Office.
Scenario 3: Under-construction project on a clean title
A developer on Koh Samui (Bophut area) purchased land directly from a Thai owner with no nominee structure involved. The development company is registered with the DBD (Department of Business Development) and shows a transparent shareholder structure. This is a low-risk scenario, but it requires the same document verification to confirm that status - absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Comparison table
| Parameter | Scenario 1: land under nominee | Scenario 2: resale from nominee seller | Scenario 3: clean title |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal risk level | High - possible forced land disposal order | Medium - complications on the seller's side | Low - standard transfer process |
| Impact on buyer's chanote | Registration of unit title potentially blocked | Transfer delayed | No impact |
| Financial cost of error | Up to 100% of instalments paid (typically 2-8 million THB) | Funds frozen for 6-18 months | None |
| Documents to verify | DBD extract for land company + land chanote + shareholder list | DBD extract for seller + unit chanote + encumbrance check | DBD extract for developer + land chanote + EIA |
| Verification timeline | 2-4 weeks | 1-2 weeks | 1-2 weeks |
| Typical Phuket locations | Bang Tao, Layan, Surin | Kamala, Karon | Rawai, Nai Harn |
| Typical Koh Samui locations | Bophut, Maenam | Chaweng, Lamai | Maenam |
Risks and mistakes
Based on cases we have tracked through our monitoring work, we set out the key errors and attach measurable red-flag criteria to each.
Mistake 1: Skipping verification of the developer's land-holding company
A foreign buyer paid 3.2 million THB across three instalments for an off-plan condominium unit in the Surin area of Phuket. The buyer did not check the shareholder structure of the entity that held the land beneath the project. That company carried three Thai shareholders controlling a combined 51 percent stake, yet none of them showed declared income sufficient to have contributed the registered capital - a textbook nominee signal. Once the company appeared on the Land Department investigation list, construction halted. Based on our estimates, recovering funds through civil proceedings in Thailand takes 2 to 5 years.
Measurable red flag: Thai shareholders in a land-holding company with registered capital below 1 million THB per person and no verifiable operational connection to the developer's business.
Mistake 2: No DBD check before signing the reservation agreement
A buyer reserving a condominium unit in Bophut on Koh Samui signed the reservation agreement and paid a 200,000 THB deposit. Only after the payment did a legal review reveal that the developer's company had changed its shareholder structure two months earlier - specifically, transferring shares from a foreign national to a Thai national. A shareholder restructuring of that kind during a period of heightened enforcement is a strong indicator that a nominee arrangement may be being concealed.
Measurable red flag: any change of shareholders in the developer's DBD record within the previous 12 months, particularly a reduction of foreign ownership below 49 percent.
Mistake 3: Assuming freehold condo ownership is fully insulated from land problems
Some buyers assume that because they are purchasing a freehold condominium unit rather than a leasehold interest, any land-title issues facing the developer are irrelevant to them. In practice, if the land beneath the building is challenged, the condominium juristic person loses its legal foundation for managing common areas. In an extreme scenario, the entire building becomes an object sitting on disputed land, which undermines the value and transferability of every unit in the project.
Measurable red flag: the developer cannot or will not provide a copy of the land chanote bearing the condominium registration annotation filed at the Land Office.
Mistake 4: Accepting a front-loaded payment schedule with a nominee-exposed developer
A buyer in the Layan area agreed to a 40/30/30 instalment structure (40 percent at reservation, 30 percent at foundation completion, 30 percent at handover) rather than a more buyer-protective 30/70 or stage-based schedule. The developer's land-holding company subsequently came under investigation. Under the 40/30/30 structure, the buyer had already paid 70 percent of the purchase price before the finishing stage - long before any title transfer was possible. A 30/70 structure would have capped the pre-handover exposure at 30 percent.
Document checklist before signing
Based on the August 2026 enforcement framework described by Legal500, our analysts track the following minimum document set:
- DBD extract (Department of Business Development): current shareholder list for both the developer entity and the land-holding entity (these are often two separate companies)
- Land chanote: ownership verification, mortgage encumbrances, and the condominium registration annotation
- Shareholder history: DBD historical filings covering the past 24 months, with particular attention to any ownership changes
- Financial statements of the land-holding company: available through DBD; used to verify whether Thai shareholders had the financial capacity to contribute registered capital
- Construction permit (Ror. 4): confirms the permit was issued to the current land owner
- EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment): required for projects above 80 units; absence of an EIA is an independent red flag
FAQ
Is buying a freehold condo in Thailand still viable given the nominee investigations?
Yes, provided that due diligence covers the land beneath the project and not only the individual unit. The investigations target land-holding structures, but their effects cascade into condominium projects built on those parcels. A verified DBD extract and a clean land chanote with the condominium registration annotation eliminate the majority of the risk.
How can we identify whether a Phuket developer uses a nominee structure?
Our analysts request a DBD extract for the entity registered as owner of the project land. The key signals are: Thai shareholders with no operational connection to the development industry, registered capital that is disproportionately low relative to the land value, and shareholder changes within the past 12 to 24 months.
What does developer due diligence cost in Thailand in 2026?
Based on our market estimates, a comprehensive review of a land-holding company and its title documentation by a Thai law firm costs between 15,000 and 40,000 THB (approximately 420 to 1,120 USD at 2026 rates). That is a small fraction of the potential loss, which can run into millions of baht.
What happens if the developer's company is found to be a nominee structure after a condo purchase?
The outcome depends primarily on whether the condominium was formally registered at the Land Office before the investigation reached that entity. A fully registered condominium with individually registered unit titles gives the buyer a significantly stronger legal position than a project where registration was still pending. We continue to track court outcomes in comparable cases.
Are individual foreign buyers personally at risk in these investigations?
The investigations target companies, not individual freehold condo purchasers. However, if a foreign national holds shares in a Thai company that owns land (for example, through a villa ownership structure), that company may appear on the investigation list. Per Pattaya Mail reporting from September 2026, foreign nationals in related cases have faced financial penalties and visa cancellations in some instances, not automatic deportation.
Which Phuket districts carry the highest nominee-related risk?
Based on our field monitoring, the highest concentration of nominee land structures on Phuket is in the premium coastal areas: Bang Tao, Layan, Surin, and Kamala, where land values are highest and the financial incentive to circumvent ownership regulations is strongest. On Koh Samui, Bophut and Chaweng show analogous patterns.
Can a buyer check a company in the DBD system independently?
Yes. The DBD e-Service portal (dbd.go.th) publishes basic registration data in Thai. A shareholder extract can be ordered in person or through a representative for approximately 200 to 500 THB. For a full financial and ownership analysis, our analysts recommend engaging a qualified Thai law firm.
How long does the Land Department enforcement process take for a single company?
Authorities set end-September 2026 as the target completion date for the first phase covering the 2,200 identified entities. The remaining group of approximately 10,000 companies is still in the verification phase. Based on our estimates, the full enforcement cycle for a single entity runs 6 to 24 months from the point of formal investigation commencement.
Our team's assessment
The 2026 nominee enforcement tightening is a structural shift, not a one-off campaign. The Ministry of Interior has expanded the powers of provincial committees and incorporated immigration and tax data into shareholder verification. That raises the baseline due diligence standard for condominium purchases in Thailand on a permanent basis.
For any foreign buyer evaluating a freehold condominium on Phuket or Koh Samui, we recommend a three-stage verification approach: (1) obtain and review the DBD extract for both the land-holding entity and the developer entity, as these are often separate companies; (2) verify the land chanote at the Land Office and confirm that the condominium registration annotation is present; (3) assess the instalment schedule against the financial exposure scenario if the project were halted. The cost of that verification is 15,000 to 40,000 THB. The cost of skipping it is potentially the entire invested amount.
Researching property in Phuket or Koh Samui? Get in touch - our analysts will prepare a data brief for your shortlisted location.